for free chat rooms features, amazing online chat rooms, and mobile chat at the click of a mouse.free chat now , chat no register , free text chat , random chat , Singles chat , Nickname , Age , Sex ( Male / Female ) , Country and State.Particularly for heads of states, given the power they wield, the possibility of nasty skeletons or even well known bad behavior does not seem to deter the Nobel award winners.Thus, for example, even if the academy concludes that Trump’s withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal has sparked a conflagration between Israel and Iran or is likely to “ fuel an arms race in the Middle East and fan sectarian conflicts from Syria to Yemen,” they could view action in promoting peace on one front as decisive, regardless of whether a nominee retards or undermines peace on other fronts.But after a more thorough exploration of the Nobel’s past practices, I concluded that one should never say never.I want to explain why if the Nobel committee agrees with the Republicans on the merits that Trump did in fact promote peace here, they may be likely to grant him the award.But the Nobel has been given to others who have begun their path to peace with a hardline stance.For instance, 1978 winner Anwar Sadat started the 1973 war against Israel that “ultimately led to the peace drive that wound up in Camp David” and 1973 winner Henry Kissinger, who was awarded the prize for helping to end the Vietnam war, had engaged in such vicious warfighting that his award prompted Tom Lehrer to quip that satire had become obsolete.
Like with all things Trump, it depends on whom you ask.
The academy has long fended off criticism for selecting individuals perceived to be unworthy of the peace prize or other honors.
But I believe (and historians, feel free to correct me), Trump is unique at least in recent history for engaging in bad behavior that undermines the Nobel itself.
First, should the Nobel decision-makers agree with the congressional Republicans’ assessment of the facts on the ground, it fits well with recent past practices to award President Trump, possibly along with South Korean President Moon Jae-in and North Korean Supreme Leader Kim Jong-un.
The Norwegian Academy, the peace prize awarding body, likes using the awards both to award past accomplishments, such as getting states to move toward peace, as well as for future-looking goals to “further stabilize the peace arrangement, encourage others to follow suit and pursue peaceful conflict resolution and promote a normative climate in which negotiated solutions are valued.” The academy has selected several individuals involved in negotiating peace processes with at least 12 such awards since 1980.