Fossil record dating assumptions

Below are the most common reasons: This site uses cookies to improve performance by remembering that you are logged in when you go from page to page.To provide access without cookies would require the site to create a new session for every page you visit, which slows the system down to an unacceptable level.For example, the site cannot determine your email name unless you choose to type it.

c) Atmospheric carbon forms just 0.0005% of the current carbon reservoir—99.66% of the earth's carbon exists in limestone, 0.31% in oil and gas, and 0.02% in coal.

Many examples from literature show that the zero-reset assumption is not always valid.

Volcanic ejecta of Mount Rangitoto (Auckland, New Zealand) was found to have a potassium-40 age of 485,000 years, yet trees buried within the volcanic material were dated with the carbon-14 method to be less than 300 years old.

Evolutionists assume that the rate of cosmic bombardment of the atmosphere has always remained constant and that the rate of decay has remained constant.

Scientists place great faith in this dating method, and yet more than 50% of radiocarbon dates from geological and archaeological samples of northeastern North America have been deemed unacceptable after investigation.

Leave a Reply